Files
brewpi/README.md
T
jens bb818c71d4 docs: refresh README for this session's accumulated changes
- Architecture diagram: add client/user_config.py and
  components/sud_forecast.py; note the pid/ controllers' 4-state FSM
  (IDLE/HEAT/HOLD/COOL) and master enabled switch; expand the GUI
  client's description (ambient temp, controller enable, pot reset,
  Sud New/Load/Save/Start/Pause/Stop, forecast plot).
- Mash schedules: document Start's restart-from-finished behavior,
  Pause's freeze-and-resume semantics, and the temperature
  controller's enabled lifecycle (SudTask owns it during a run, off by
  default otherwise, GUI checkbox for manual mode).
- Fix sude/'s "heat"/"hold" wording to the actual "ramp"/"hold" keys;
  add matplotlib (demos-only) to the server requirements list.
- Logging & analysis: mention the text log alongside the .mat traces.
2026-06-21 16:52:48 +02:00

269 lines
14 KiB
Markdown

# BrewPi
A Python-based controller for automating the mash/brewing process of beer: it
holds a pot of liquid at target temperatures (or ramps it at a target heating
rate) according to a configurable mash schedule, drives a heater and stirrer,
and exposes live control/telemetry over a WebSocket so a desktop GUI (or any
other client) can monitor and steer the brew.
The project began as a simulation/control-theory playground (Smith-predictor
temperature control, pot transport-delay model, see
[`docs/NonLinMPC.pdf`](docs/NonLinMPC.pdf)) and has grown real-hardware
backends for an induction hob and an RTD temperature probe.
## Architecture
```
server/brewpi.py Server entry point: wires sensor, pot/plant,
heater, temperature controller and stirrer
together, runs them as asyncio tasks, and
serves state/commands over a WebSocket.
client/brewpi_gui.py PyQt5 desktop client (brewpi.ui) that connects
to the server's WebSocket, displays live
temperature/power/state, and lets the user set
target temperature, heat rate, stirrer speed,
ambient temperature, and switch the heater/
stirrer/temperature controller on or off (plus
a "reset Pot to ambient" button, shown only
when the server's plant is simulated) - plus
Sud control (New/Load/Save/Start/Pause/Stop)
and its forecast plot on the Automatic tab.
client/user_config.py Small JSON-backed key/value store
(~/.config/brewpi/gui.json) for GUI preferences
that should survive restarts (last Sud file
dialog directory, last ambient temperature) -
distinct from the server's config.json and
from sude/*.json schedules.
components/ Pluggable building blocks behind factories:
pid/ temperature controllers: plain PID
("Normal") or PID + Smith predictor
("Smith", runs two internal pot models —
one with the plant's transport delay, one
without — to compensate for the dead time).
Both are a 4-state FSM (IDLE/HEAT/HOLD/COOL)
with a master enabled switch - IDLE means
disabled (output forced to 0); COOL handles
a target below the current temperature with
its own gains, output forced to 0 only by
the actuator that can't act on it (e.g. a
heat-only heater), not by the controller
assuming it can't cool
plant/ pot thermal model (transport-delay line)
used in simulation
sensor/ temperature sensors: simulated, or a real
MAX31865 RTD amplifier over SPI
actor/ heater and stirrer drivers: simulated, a
Hendi induction hob (serial protocol), or a
Pololu 1376 stirrer motor controller
sud.py mash-schedule sequencer; starts out empty,
a client loads one of several sude/*.json
schedules onto it and it drives the
temperature controller from it
sud_forecast.py predicts how long a loaded schedule will
actually take by simulating it with the
same kind of plant/controller (and params)
as the real server - see "Forecast vs.
actual duration" below
tasks/ Async tasks (one per component) that poll
hardware/sim state at a fixed interval and
publish changes through the message dispatcher.
ws/ Minimal WebSocket pub/sub layer: server
(single- and multi-user), client, and a
keyed message dispatcher (e.g. "Sensor",
"Heater", "TempCtrl", "Stirrer", "Pot", "Sud").
tracer.py Logs traced variables to .mat files (for
offline analysis/tuning in MATLAB/Octave,
see results.m / results_tc.m).
scripts/demos/ Standalone, eyeballed-plot demos (matplotlib)
exercising components/* in isolation — pid/,
plant/, and a full mash-schedule run in sud/.
Not used at runtime; run directly, e.g.
`python -m scripts.demos.sud.demo_sud`.
sude/ Mash schedules ("Sud" = brew/wort), each a
JSON list of "ramp"/"hold" steps with target
temperature/heat rate or hold duration,
per-step stirrer timing, and optional pause
for user confirmation.
config.json.templ Configuration template (real hardware).
config.json.sim Configuration template for simulation mode.
```
### Data flow
The server (`server/brewpi.py`) loads `config.json`, builds the configured
sensor/heater/stirrer/controller via factories (`*Factory.create(name, ...)`)
based on the `Controller` section (`sensor_name`, `heater_name`,
`stirrer_name`, `pid_type`, or `"sim"` for any of them), and connects their
outputs to each other's inputs via `set_on_changed` callbacks, e.g.:
- sensor temperature → temperature controller's `theta_ist`
- temperature controller output `y` → heater power
- heater effective power → pot model power (simulation only)
Each component runs inside its own `ATask` at a configurable interval
(`Controller.dt`, scaled by `sim_warp_factor`) and pushes state changes onto a
keyed WebSocket channel that any connected client can subscribe to and send
commands back on (e.g. `{"TempCtrl": {"Soll": {"Temp": 65}}}`).
## Requirements
- Python 3.8+
- Server (`server/requirements.txt`): `numpy`, `scipy`, `matplotlib` (only
for `scripts/demos/*`, not the running server itself), `websockets`,
`dpath`, and `pyserial`/`spidev` if using real hardware backends.
- Client (`client/requirements.txt`): `PyQt5`.
Install with:
```bash
pip install -r server/requirements.txt
pip install -r client/requirements.txt
```
## Running
1. Copy a config template to `config.json` next to `brewpi.py` and adjust it.
Use `config.json.sim` to run entirely in simulation (no hardware needed),
or `config.json.templ` as a starting point for real hardware (set the
heater/stirrer serial ports and sensor type).
2. Start the server:
```bash
cd server
./brewpi.py
```
This serves the WebSocket on `ws://0.0.0.0:8765`.
3. Start the GUI client and connect to the server's URI:
```bash
cd client
./brewpi_gui.py
```
`server/brewpi.sh` shows how this is wired up to run under a `virtualenvwrapper`
environment (`$WORKON_HOME`/`$BREWPI_HOME`) on a Raspberry Pi-style deployment.
## Mash schedules
Files under `sude/` describe a brew's mash schedule ("Sud"): `pot_mass`,
`pot_material` (fixed for the whole brew), and a `steps` list, each a ramp, a
hold, or both, plus a step-level `temperature` (the target a ramp step ramps
to, and what a hold step holds at):
- a ramp — `"ramp": {"rate": ...}` — ramp to `temperature` at `rate`
(°C/min), and/or
- a hold — `"hold": {"duration": ...}` — hold the current target for
`duration` minutes (omit/`0` for an immediate step).
A step with both ramps to `temperature` and then holds there for `duration`
- useful for a mash rest ("ramp to 63°C, then hold 40 min") without needing
two separate schedule entries. `user_wait_for_continue`/`user_message`
(below) apply once the whole step is done, i.e. after the hold phase if
there is one.
Both `ramp` and `hold` carry a `stirrer` block (`speed`, `interval_time`,
`on_ratio`): `interval_time: 0` runs the stirrer continuously at `speed`;
`interval_time > 0` pulses it on a period of `interval_time` seconds, on for
`on_ratio * interval_time` of it. A step may also set
`user_wait_for_continue: true` (with an optional `user_message` to prompt
the user with) to pause for confirmation once the step completes, e.g. to
add malt or check gravity, instead of advancing immediately.
Each step also has its own `grain_mass`/`water_mass` (defaulted like
everything else from `default.step`), since both change over the course of
a brew — e.g. malt going in partway through, or water boiling off. Pass a
step's `grain_mass`/`water_mass` to `Sud.derive_plant_params()` (together
with the brew-wide `pot_mass`/`pot_material`) to get that step's lumped
`Pot` `M`/`C`; `scripts/demos/sud/demo_sud.py` recomputes and re-applies
these (via `Pot.set_thermal_params()`/`TempController.set_model_params()`,
on both the real plant and the controller's Smith-predictor model) every
time the current step changes, instead of deriving them once at startup.
The top-level `default.step` object gives every field above (including the
nested `ramp`/`hold`/`stirrer` blocks) a default value; a step in `steps`
only needs to specify the fields it overrides — anything it omits is filled
in from `default.step`, recursively. A step is a ramp or a hold depending on
which of those two keys it specifies; the other is not defaulted in.
The server always runs a `Sud` (`components/sud.py`), starting out empty (no
schedule) - `sude/` can hold several schedule files, and a client loads one
of them onto the running `Sud` (`{"Sud": {"Load": <sud.json contents>}}`),
kept purely in memory until replaced by another Load or the server
restarts; nothing is ever read from or written to `sude/*.json` by the
server itself, that's on the client (e.g. the GUI's File menu). `Sud`
resolves each raw step against `default.step` and tracks the current
(resolved) step, while `tasks/sud.py`'s `SudTask` drives the temperature
controller's `theta_soll`/`heatrate_soll` from ramp steps (advancing once
`theta_ist` settles close to the target), counts down hold steps'
`duration`, and applies each step's `stirrer` block (`interval_time`/
`on_ratio` map directly onto the stirrer's cycle time/duty cycle). It
exposes progress (current step, remaining hold time, state, any
`user_message`) on the `"Sud"` WebSocket channel and accepts
`{"Sud": {"Start": true}}` to begin the schedule (also restarts one that's
already finished), `{"Sud": {"Pause": true}}` to freeze progress without
losing it, and `{"Sud": {"Confirm": true}}` to acknowledge a pause and move
to the next step.
The temperature controller has a master enabled switch (off by default -
see `components/pid/temp_controller_base.py`): `SudTask` enables it for as
long as a run is in progress (any state other than idle/finished) and
disables it again - forcing the heater output to 0 - the moment it stops or
finishes, handing control back to manual mode. The GUI's Manual tab has an
"Enabled" checkbox for driving this directly outside of a Sud run; while
disabled, its temperature/heat-rate setpoint controls are inactive.
### Forecast vs. actual duration
The GUI's Automatic tab shows up to three time estimates for a schedule:
- Immediately on load, a quick *naive* preview: walk the schedule assuming
every ramp instantly achieves and holds its declared `rate`
(`abs(delta)/rate`) and every hold lasts exactly its declared `duration`.
Deliberately approximate - it's just a placeholder until the next one
arrives a moment later.
- A *simulated* estimate, computed server-side (`components/sud_forecast.py`'s
`SudForecastEstimator`) by actually running the schedule through a
throwaway `Sud`/`Pot`/temperature-controller trio built from the same
params (`pid_type`, `TempCtrl` gains, plant params, ambient, heater max
power) the real server uses - a multi-hour brew simulates in well under a
second since it's pure CPU-bound iteration, no real time/IO involved. This
replaces the naive preview a moment after a schedule is loaded.
- Once running, a *dynamic* one: the already-elapsed part is the actual
measured trace, and only the remaining steps are re-projected from the
live temperature/step/`hold_remaining` each tick.
The naive estimate is structurally optimistic - it assumes the plant
instantly tracks the declared rate and that "reached" is instant once the
math says so, when the real PID cascade (`theta_err -> pid_hold ->
heatrate_soll -> pid_heat -> heater power -> actual heat rate`) needs real
time to spin up and settle within the tight 0.2°C "reached" tolerance
(`tasks/sud.py`'s `TEMP_REACHED_TOLERANCE`). The simulated estimate accounts
for that (it's driven by the real controller dynamics), so it's normally
within a few percent of how the dynamic one settles once a run actually
finishes - if the two diverge by far more than that, suspect a real control
issue rather than a forecasting one (see the `HoldCool` threshold note in
`components/pid/temp_controller_base.py` - too tight a threshold there once
caused exactly this kind of large, otherwise-unexplained gap, by making the
controller chatter in and out of `COOL` and never actually converge).
## Logging & analysis
`tracer.py` (and `tasks/tracer.py`) periodically dump traced signals
(temperatures, heat rates, heater power) to `logs/*.mat` files, which can be
loaded in MATLAB/Octave — see `results.m` and `results_tc.m` — to evaluate
and tune the controller.
`server/brewpi.py` also mirrors everything it prints (every component's
`print()`-based status/debug output) to a plain text log,
`logs/brewpi.<timestamp>.log`, alongside the `.mat` traces - useful for
post-mortems without needing to have been watching the console live.