Follow up on postfix-sasl and apache-noscript watch items
Both were left as "revisit if it escalates" notes from earlier audits. Checked live logs on alpha via SSH (port 10022): postfix-sasl remains scattered low-volume noise, not a coordinated low-and-slow campaign like the dovecot spray; the original three /24s behind the apache-noscript distributed scan are no longer active, current activity is normal per-IP jail behavior. No fixes needed for either; also reconfirmed the dyndns per-user auth binding gap is still present and unfixed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -282,6 +282,12 @@ Audited 2026-07-20 — which public hostnames require credentials:
|
||||
design — it needs subnet-level (CIDR) banning instead, which risks
|
||||
blocking legitimate traffic sharing that block (e.g. carrier NAT). Left
|
||||
as routine scan noise for now; revisit if it escalates.
|
||||
**Follow-up 2026-07-26**: rechecked — the original three `/24`s are gone
|
||||
from current logs entirely (that specific campaign appears to have moved
|
||||
on). `apache-noscript` shows normal jail activity (42 total bans, 3
|
||||
currently banned) from ordinary repeat-offender IPs already caught by
|
||||
per-IP thresholds, not a new distributed single-shot pattern. No
|
||||
escalation; still fine to leave as-is.
|
||||
|
||||
- **No real nameserver redundancy**: 2026-07-19, `ns1.jayfield.org` and
|
||||
`ns2.jayfield.org` were registered as this domain's NS records at the
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user